Çѱ¹ÀÇÇÐ³í¹® µ¥ÀÌÅͺ£À̽º
Á¦¸ñ À±¸®ÀûÀÎ ¿¬±¸ ÃâÆÇÀ» À§ÇÑ ±¹Á¦ ±Ô¹ü
±Û¾´ÀÌ °ü¸®ÀÚ
÷ºÎÆÄÀÏ  pdf_0003344.pdf  

Ãâó : ¿¬±¸Àç´Ü

URL: https://www.nrf.re.kr/index

¿ä¾à¹®
ÀÌ Ã¥Àº ¹ø¿ª¼­·Î¼­ ¿¬±¸³í¹®ÀÇ ¹ßÇ¥¿Í °ü·ÃµÈ ÀÌÇØ´ç»çÀÚ(ÀúÀÚ, ½É»çÀÚ, ÆíÁýÀÎ, ¹ßÇàÀÎ µî)µéÀÌ ²À ¾Ë°í ÁöÄÑ¾ß ÇÒ ±¹Á¦ÀûÀÎ À±¸®±Ô¹üµéÀ» ¼ö·ÏÇÏ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀ¸·Î ±¹Á¦ÀÇÇÐ ÇмúÁö ÆíÁýÀÎÀ§¿øȸ(International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, ICMJE)ÀÇ ±Ç°í¾È°ú ÇÔ²² ¿µ±¹ ¼ÒÀç ÃâÆÇÀ±¸®À§¿øȸ(Committee on Publication Ethics, COPE)¿Í ¼¼°èÀÇÇÐÆíÁýÀÎÇùÀÇȸ(World Association of Medical Editors, WAME)ÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä ÁöħµéÀÌ Æ÷ÇԵǾî ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
 
 
 

1Àå. ±¹Á¦ÀÇÇÐÇмúÁö ÆíÁýÀÎÀ§¿øȸ(ICMJE) ±Ç°í9
a. ÀÇÇÐ ÇмúÁö¿¡ °ÔÀçµÇ´Â Çмú ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¼öÇà, º¸°í, ÆíÁý°ú ÃâÆÇ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±Ç°í¾È11
Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical
Journals

2Àå. ÀÏ¹Ý ¿øÄ¢55
a. Ã¥ÀÓÀÖ´Â ¿¬±¸ ÃâÆÇ : ÆíÁýÀÎÀ» À§ÇÑ ±¹Á¦ Ç¥ÁØ57
Responsible research publication: international standards for editors
b. Ã¥ÀÓÀÖ´Â ¿¬±¸ ÃâÆÇ : ÀúÀÚ¸¦ À§ÇÑ ±¹Á¦ Ç¥ÁØ68
Responsible research publication: international standards for authors
c. Çмú ÃâÆÇ¿¡¼­ Åõ¸í¼º ¿øÄ¢°ú ¸ð¹üÀû ½Çõ75
Principles of Best Practice and Transparency in Scholarly Publishing
d. COPEÀÇ ÇÙ½É È°µ¿81
Our Core Practice
e. COPE ÇÙ½É È°µ¿À» ÁؼöÇϱâ À§ÇÑ ÆíÁý±¹ Á¶Á÷ ±¸¼º Áöħ : È帧µµ84
Suggested Guide for Approaching Organisation of the Editorial Office to Comply with COPE ’s Core
Practices: Flowchart (2018)

3Àå. ÀúÀÚ, ±â¿©ÀÚ, ½É»çÀÚ, ÆíÁýÀÎ, ¹ßÇàÀÎ, ÇмúÁö ¼ÒÀ¯ÁÖÀÇ ¿ªÇÒ°ú Ã¥ÀÓ87
a. ÀúÀÚµÊÀÇ ±¸¼º ¿ä¼Ò´Â ¹«¾ùÀΰ¡? COPE Åä·Ð ¹®¼­89
What constitutes authorship? COPE Discussion Document
b. ÀúÀÚµÊÀÇ ¹®Á¦¸¦ ¾î¶»°Ô ¹ß°ßÇÒ °ÍÀΰ¡97
How to Recognise Potential Authorship Problems : Flowchart (2018)
c. ¾àÅ»Àû ȤÀº À¯»ç ÇмúÁöÀÇ È®ÀÎ99
Identifying predatory or pseudo-journals
d. Àü¹®°¡ ½É»ç ÀÇÇÐ ÇмúÁö¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÀÌÇØ»óÃæ111
Conflict of Interest in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals
e. °æÀïÀû ÀÌÇصéÀÇ °ü¸®¿¡ °üÇÑ Åä·Ð/Áöħ ¹®¼­118
Discussion/guidance document on handling competing interests
f. ÀÌÇØ»óÃæÀ» °ø°³ÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ½ÀÌ ÀÇ½ÉµÉ °æ¿ì122
What to do if undisclosed conflict of interest (Col) was suspected : Flowchart (2015)
g. ½ÅÀÓ ÆíÁýÀÎÀ» À§ÇÑ À±¸®Àû ÆíÁý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÂªÀº ¾È³»¼­125
A Short Guide to Ethical Editing for New Editors
h. Àü¹®°¡ ½É»çÀÚ¸¦ À§ÇÑ COPE À±¸® Áöħ135
COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers
i. ½É»çÀÚ°¡ ÀúÀÚÀÇ °³³äÀ̳ª µ¥ÀÌÅ͸¦ µµ¿ëÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ÀǽɵǴ °æ¿ì : È帧µµ143
What to do if you suspect a reviewer has appropriated an author’s ideas or data: Flowchart

4Àå. ÇмúÁö °£Çà°ú °ü·ÃµÈ ÆíÁý°ú ÃâÆÇ »óÀÇ ¹®Á¦µé145
a. ÀúÀÚµÊÀÇ ºÐÀïÀ» ¾î¶»°Ô ´Ù·ê °ÍÀΰ¡ : ½ÅÁø ¿¬±¸ÀÚ¸¦ À§ÇÑ Áöħ147
How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers
b. ÀúÀÚµÊÀÇ º¯°æ°ú ÀúÀÚµÊÀÇ ¹®Á¦µé, À¯·É ÀúÀÚ, ¼Õ´Ô ÀúÀÚ, ¼±¹° ÀúÀÚ°¡ ÀÇ½ÉµÉ °æ¿ì :
È帧µµ155
Changes in authorship, authorship problems, and suspected ghost, guest or gift authorship: Flowcharts
(2015)
c. ¿¬±¸ Áø½Ç¼º »ç·Ê¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸ ±â°ü°ú ÇмúÁö °£ÀÇ Çù·Â : COPE Áöħ163
Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
d. ÀáÀçÀû ºÎÁ¤ÇàÀ§¿¡ °üÇÑ ÆíÁýÀå °£ÀÇ Á¤º¸ °øÀ¯175
Sharing of Information Among Editors-in-Chief Regarding Possible Misconduct
e. Åõ°í ¿ø°í¿¡¼­ À±¸®Àû ¹®Á¦°¡ ÀǽɵǴ °æ¿ì : È帧µµ178
What to do if you suspect an ethical problem with a submitted manuscript: Flowchart (2015)
f. ÆíÁýÀÎÀº Ç¥Àý¿¡ ¾î¶»°Ô ´ëÀÀÇØ¾ß Çϴ°¡? : COPE Åä·Ð ¹®¼­180
How should editors respond to plagiarism? : COPE Discussion Document
g. Ç¥Àý, µ¥ÀÌÅÍ À§Á¶°¡ ÀǽɵǴ °æ¿ì : È帧µµ197
What to do if you suspect plagiarism and fabricated data: Flowchart (2015)
h. ÅؽºÆ® ÀçÈ°¿ë Áöħ202
Text Recycling Guidelines
i. Áߺ¹(ÀÌÁß)ÃâÆÇÀÌ ÀÇ½ÉµÉ °æ¿ì : È帧µµ208
What to do if you suspect redundant (duplicate) publication: Flowchart (2015)
j. À͸í Á¦º¸ÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´ëÀÀ : COPE Åä·Ð ¹®¼­211
Responding to anonymous whistle blowers: COPE Discussion Document
k. ¿©·¯ À±¸®Àû ¹®Á¦¸¦ Á¦±âÇÑ Á¦º¸ÀÚÀÇ Ã³¸® : COPE Åä·Ð ¹®¼­215
Addressing ethics complaints from complainants who submit multiple issues: COPE Discussion
Document
l. Á¦º¸ÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ´ëÀÀ : È帧µµ219
How to respond to whistle blowers: Flowchart (2015)
m. ³í¹® öȸ Áöħ222
Retraction Guidelines

5Àå. ±âŸ ÁÖÁ¦229
a. ÀÇÇÐ Áõ·Ê º¸°í ÃâÆÇ¿¡¼­ µ¿ÀǸ¦ º¸ÀåÇÏ´Â ÇмúÁöÀÇ ¸ð¹üÀûÀÎ °ü·Ê : COPEÀÇ Áöħ231
Journals’ Best Practices for Ensuring Consent for Publishing Medical Case Reports: guidance from
COPE
b. COPE Åä·Ð ¹®¼­ : Àü¹®°¡ ½É»ç´Â ´©°¡ “¼ÒÀ¯”Çϴ°¡?236
Who “owns” peer reviews?
c. ÇÐÀ§³í¹® ÃâÆÇ°ú °ü·ÃµÈ ¹®Á¦µé¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¸ð¹üÀûÀÎ °ü·Ê¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Åä·Ð ¹®¼­245
Discussion document on best practice for issues around theses publishing
¿ë¾î 248